ABSTRACT
Objective:To evaluate the short-term efficacy of split liver transplantation (SLT) in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF).Methods:The clinical data of 9 ACLF patients receiving SLT in our center from Mar 2021 to May 2022 were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate its safety and efficacy.Results:The preoperative APASL ACLF Research consortium (AARC) score of the 9 ACLF patients was 8 points in 1 case, 9 points in 3 cases, 10 points in 3 cases, 11 points in 1 case and 12 points in 1 case, 7 cases were in AARC-ACLF grade 2, and 2 cases in grade 3.In-situ liver splitting was performed in 9 deceased donors, including 4 classical split cases, 5 full size split cases. Among these 9 ACLF patients, 2 received left half liver transplantation, 3 received right half liver transplantation, and 4 received extended right lobe liver transplantation. After transplantation, all 9 recipients were discharged fully recovered, 1 case developed Clavien grade Ⅳa complication and 2 cases developed Clavien grade Ⅲb complication.After SLT treatment the median postoperative hospital stay was 27 days, the 1-year survival rate was 100%, and the organ survival rate was 88.9%.Conclusion:Split liver transplantation is a safe and feasible treatment method for ACLF patients.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the risk factors for postoperative early recurrence of patients with single large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (tumor diameter≥5cm).Methods:Clinical data of 135 single large HCC patients who underwent radical resection from Jan 2015 to Sep 2020 in Ningbo Medical Centre Lihuili Hospital were analyzed.Results:Seventy-five HCC patients suffered recurrence,among those 42 patients had early recurrence(within 12 months). Multivariate analysis showed that alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)≥400 ng/ml ( OR=3.510,95% CI: 1.528-8.064; P=0.003) and tumor microvascular invasion (MVI) ( OR=2.769,95% CI: 1.143-6.706; P=0.024) were independent risk factors for early recurrence of single large hepatocellular carcinoma. Survival analysis showed that early recurrence risk factors significantly reduced recurrence free survival (RFS)(AFP≥400 ng/ml, χ 2=23.038, P<0.001; MVI positive , χ 2=10.554, P=0.001) and overall survival (OS) (AFP≥400 ng/ml, χ 2=14.336, P<0.001; MVI positive, χ 2=10.481, P=0.001) in single large hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Conclusion:AFP≥400 ng/ml and MVI positive are independent risk factors for postoperative early recurrence in single large hepatocellular carcinoma patients.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To study the safety and efficacy of combining portal vein resection and reconstruction (PVR) with resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC).Methods:A total of 104 patients with PHC who underwent hepatectomies for either biliary resection alone or biliary resection combined with PVR from October 2006 to December 2019 at the Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary, Ningbo Medical Center of Lihuili Hospital entered into this study. There were 63 males and 41 females, with the age of (64.4±10.4) years. The control group consisted of 75 patients who underwent biliary resection alone, while the PVR group consisted 29 patients with biliary resection combined with PVR. The patient characteristics and the follow-up outcomes of the two groups were analyzed and compared. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan Meier method with the log-rank test.Results:Wedge resection of portal vein, side to side anastomosis in 2 cases, segmental resection and end to end anastomosis in 27 cases. The time taken for PVR and portal vein resection were (12.7±2.9)(range 8 to 18)min and (20.7±7.3)(range 8 to 38) mm, respectively. The estimated blood loss for the PVR group was significantly more than the control group [ M( Q1, Q3)] 800.0 (600.0, 1 500.0) ml vs. 600.0(500.0, 1 000.0) ml ( P<0.05). Based on postoperative pathological studies, the proportion of lymph node metastasis was significantly higher in the PVR group than the control group (58.6% vs. 32.0%, P<0.05). Clavien-Dindo grade Ⅲ and above complications were 30.7%(23/75) and 34.5%(10/29) in the control and PVR groups, respectively ( P>0.05). The re-operation and postoperative 90 days mortality rates were 9.3%(7/75) and 2.7%(2/75) in the control group, compared with 3.4%(1/29) and 0 in the PVR group, respectively (both P>0.05). The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 81.1%, 44.8% and 36.4% respectively for the control group and 78.1%, 35.9% and 31.4% for the PVR group (χ 2=0.33, P=0.570). Conclusion:When compared to biliary resection alone, biliary resection combined with PVR did not significantly increase postoperative complication and mortality rates, but with comparable long-term survival outcomes. Combined biliary resection with PVR was safe and improved the resection rate in selected patients with locally advanced PHC.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To analyse the risk factors of biliary leakage after surgical resection in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC).Methods:The medical data on 179 patients who underwent surgical resection for PHCC at the Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Ningbo Medical Centre Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo University from April 2000 to April 2020 were collected, and 160 patients were finally enrolled into this study. There were 86 males and 74 females, aged (63.4±10.8) years. The 44 patients with class B biliary leakage and the 5 patients with class C biliary leakage were classified into the biliary leakage group, while the remaining 111 patients were classified into the control group. Risk factors of biliary leakage were analysed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.Results:Operation time ≥360 min, resection and reconstruction of hepatic hilar vessels on the preserved side of liver and number of bile duct openings of >3 in remnant liver were significantly higher in the biliary leakage than the control group (all P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that resection and reconstruction of hepatic hilar vessels on the preserved side ( OR=2.322, 95% CI: 1.078-5.002, P=0.028) and 3 or more bile duct openings in the remnant liver ( OR=2.656, 95% CI: 1.198-5.892, P=0.016) were significantly associated with biliary leakage. Conclusion:Resection and reconstruction of hepatic hilar vessels on the preserved side of liver and 3 or more bile duct openings in remnant liver were independent risk factors for biliary leakage after PHCC resection.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To explore the feasibility of technological modification and innovation of full-left/full-right liver splitting in situ for donors and examine the safety of clinical application for liver transplantation (LT).Methods:From March 2021 to June 2022, clinical and surgical data are retrospectively reviewed for 27 donors undergoing full-left/full-right liver splitting in situ and the corresponding 49 recipients undergoing full-left/full-right LT.According to the split liver technique used in donor liver surgery, they are divided into conventional split group(group A, 13 cases)and innovative split group(group B, 14 cases). The corresponding recipients are divided into two groups of recipient C(25 cases)and recipient D(24 cases). General profiles, intraoperative findings, type of vascular allocation and short-term outcomes in two groups are compared.After full-size split liver transplantation(fSLT), follow-ups continued until the end of September 2022.Results:There are 23 males and 4 females in donors.The causes of mortality for donors are traumatic head injury(12 cases)cerebrovascular accident(13 cases)and anoxia encephalopathy(2 cases). Baseline characteristics of two groups indicate that body weight and body mass index(BMI)are higher in group B and blood sodium level is lower than that in group A( P<0.05). No statistical differences exist for the others.Liver splitting time is significantly shorter in group B than that in group A(175 vs.230 min, P=0.022). No significant inter-group difference exists in type of vascular allocation.Retrohepatic inferior vena cava(IVC)is split in one case in group A and 10 cases in group B( P=0.001). Among 20 cases of right hemiliver requiring a reconstruction of segment Ⅴ/Ⅷ venous outflow, 12 cases in group A and 3 cases in group B are reconstructed with conventional independent bridging method(independent type)while another 5 cases in group B reconstruct with innovated technique by bridging Ⅴ/Ⅷ vein for splitting IVC with iliac vessel and molding all outflows as one for anastomosis(combined typ e). There is significant inter-group difference( P=0.004). No significant differences exist in operative duration, anhepatic phase or blood loss between groups C and B, except for T tube retaining in 7 cases of group A and 14 cases of group D( P=0.032). Twelve cases developed a total of 26 instances of≥Clavien-Dindo grade Ⅲ complications.Of which, 7 cases in group C and 5 cases in group D show no significant difference in postoperative morbidity.However, for serious biliary complications(≥Clavien Dindo grade Ⅲ), there are 6 cases in group C versus none in group D( P=0.016). Two cases died from postoperative complication with a postoperative mortality rate of 4.1%.Postoperative hospital stay is similar in two groups.And accumulates 6/12-month survivals were 95.9% and 87.7% for grafts and 95.9% and 92.4% for recipients respectively. Conclusions:Operative duration of full-left/full-right liver splitting in situ tends to shorten with an accumulation of a certain amount of cases.Technological modification and innovation in IVC splitting and segment Ⅴ/Ⅷ vein reconstruction should be further validated as both feasible and safe by short-term outcomes of the corresponding recipients.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To evaluate clinical and pathological factors related to the actual 5-year survival of patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCC).Methods:A total of 94 HCC patients who underwent radical surgery at the Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Li Huili Hospital of Ningbo Medical Center from Jan 2000 to Jun 2015 were enrolled in this study.Patients were divided into two groups: postoperative survival group beyond 5 years and death group within 5 years. The clinical and pathological features of the two groups were analyzed.Results:Of the 94 patients, 19 (20.2%) had a postoperative survival time of more than 5 years. The actual 5-year overall survival rate of HCC patients (20.2%) was lower than that estimated by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (22.2%). Gender, age, CEA value, CA199 value, total bilirubin, Child-Pugh classification, Bismuth classification and preoperative jaundice reduction were not significantly different between the two groups nor there were significant difference between two groups in operation time, blood loss, surgical procedure, combined caudate lobectomy, combined pancreaticoduodenectomy, combined resection of surrounding organs, vascular reconstruction and number of bile duct orifices in remnant liver surface. There were significant differences between two groups in the variables of pathological phenotype ( P=0.012), lymph node metastasis ( P=0.001) and resection level ( P=0.048). Conclusion:Non-papillary type, lymph node metastasis and R 1 resection are the independent risk factors of the actual 5-year survival.
ABSTRACT
Objective:The aims of this study were to compare the efficacy between salvage liver transplantation (sLT) and rehepatectomy (RR) basing on the propensity score matching (PSM), and to explore the prognositc factors of patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Methods:124 patients with intrahepatic recurrence after hepatectomy in our center from January 2012 to August 2018 were divided into sLT group( n=46) and RR group( n=78). 34 patients were selected for data analysis base on 1∶1 propensity score matching (PSM). The advantages and disadvantages of the two surgical methods and the prognostic factors of the patients were discussed by comparing the basic clinical data, OS and DFS of the two groups before and after matching. Results:Before matching, the pre-operative serum total bilirubin, the occurrence of multiple tumors, the proportion of preoperative TACE and the proportion of patients within Milan criteria of the sLT group were higher than those of the RR group, and the maximum tumor diameter of the sLT group was shorter than that of the RR group ( P<0.05); the time of operation, the amount of intra-operative blood loss, the positive of MVI and the proportion of postoperative Clavien grade Ⅲ and above of RR group were higher than those of RR group ( P<0.05). After matching, the operation time, intra-operative blood loss and the proportion of postoperative complications of sLT group were higher than those of RR group; there was nosignificant difference between 1-, 3- and 5- years OS of sLT group and RR group( P>0.05), the 1-, 3- and 5-years DFS of sLT group were better than those of RR group( P<0.05); AFP≥100 μg/L was the independent risk factor of OS, and the type of operation and AFP≥100 μg/L were independent risk factors of DFS. Conclusions:The pre-operative condition of sLT group was more severe, and the operation time, intra-operative blood loss and post-operative severe complication rate of sLT group were higher than those of RR group, and the DFS time of sLT group was longer than that of RR group, but there was no significant difference in OS between the two groups.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To study the impact of intraoperative pancreatic resection margin status on prognosis in patients with pancreatic head cancer.@*Methods@#The clinical and follow-up data of 109 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy at Ningbo Lihuili Hospital from March 2012 to October 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. The association of intraoperative resection margin status and other clinicopathological factors on prognosis was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazard model. Logistic multivariate analysis was used to study factors influencing the margin status.@*Results@#Of 109 patients, 20 had a positive intraoperative resection margin, and 89 had a negative margin. Postoperative pathological examination showed that all the patients had a negative surgical margin. Univariate analysis suggested that CA19-9 before operation, preoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, intraoperative pancreatic resection margin status, maximum diameter of tumor, perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, tumor differentiation, and N staging were significantly related to survival in the entire cohort (all P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed CA19-9 ≥37 IU/ml, perineural invasion, lymph node metastasis, tumor diameter ≥4 cm and poor tumor differentiation were independent risk factors of bad prognosis (P<0.05). Univariate analysis of prognosis showed significant differences in lifetime prognosis between the positive margin group and the negative group (median survival time: 11 months vs. 21 months, P<0.05), but a positive resection margin was not an independent risk factor on prognosis (P>0.05). Analysis of the clinicopathological factors between the two groups showed that in the positive pancreatic neck margin group, the distribution of adverse pathologic factors like low tumor differentiation, tumor diameter ≥4 cm, perineural invasion and lymphovascular invasion were significantly different compared with the negative group (P<0.05). Tumor diameter ≥4 cm (OR=5.72, 95%CI: 1.60~20.49) and low tumor differentiation (OR=3.79, 95%CI: 1.20~11.95) were independent influencing factors of positive margin on logistic multivariate analysis.@*Conclusions@#Intraoperative pancreatic positive margin was not an independent risk factor of prognosis, but it was meaningful in predicting survival. Presence of positive margins was often combined with existence of some adverse pathological features, such as large tumor diameter and low tumor differentiation. Prognosis of patients with a positive margin was often poor. A positive pancreatic margin was an intraoperative marker of poor tumor biology in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the clinical outcomes of liver transplantation by using donation after cardiac death (DCD) in single center.Methods The clinical data of 115 DCD donors and recipients of liver transplantation from Jan 2012 to Sep 2017 at our institution were analyzed,including preoperative general data,intraoperative status,and postoperative early complications.Patients were followed up to Oct 30th,2017.The measurement data with normal distribution were analyzed by t test,the enumeration data were analyzed by chi-square test or Fisher exact probability test,and the Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis.Results All of the 115 donors were within China category Ⅲ using the classification of China donor after cardiac death.Donor graft mean warm ischemic time and cold ischemic time was (10 ± 4) min and (6.1 ± 1.7) h,respectively.All of the recipients underwent liver transplantation successfully.The mean preoperation MELD score was 14 ± 7.Seven patients were ABO-incompatible liver transplantation (A→O,3 cases,B→O 2 cases,AB→O 1 case,AB→A 1 case).19 patients (16.5％) had postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification grade Ⅲ-Ⅴ).The perioperative mortality was 2.6％ (3 cases).All patients were followed up for an average (21 ± 17) mon.Patients 1-,3-,and 5-year survival rates were 93.6％,81.8％,and 77.5％,respectively.Conclusion The outcome of DCD liver transplantation is favorable at our institution under careful donor and recipient selection and intensive perioperative management.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the clinical results of laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP) and open spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (OSPDP).Methods From Jan 2014 to Aug 2017,the clinical results of 30 patients undergoing LSPDP were compared with those of 20 OSPDP patients.The postoperative pancreatic fistula rate was the main observation index.Results There was significant difference in operation time [(140.33 ±55.93) min vs.(182.71 ±43.51)min],blood loss [(175.61 ± 180.78) ml vs.(253.51 ± 176.06) ml],postoperative hospital stay [(6.16 ± 7.22) d vs.(8.85 ± 9.36) d],postoperative exhaust [(2.17 ± 1.43) d vs.(3.10 ± 1.89) d],and postoperative feeding time [(2.26 ± 1.78)d vs.(3.42 ±2.01)d] between LSPDP and OSPDP.LSPDP group was better than OSPDP group (all P ＜ 0.05).The rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula (66.7％ vs.70.0％) and overall complications (80％ vs.90.0％) were not statistically different between the two groups.Pancreatic leakage occurred in 20 cases,lung infection in 1 case,peritoneal infection in 1 case and chylous leakage in one case in LSPDP group,while pancreatic leakage in 14 cases,lung infection in 2 cases,and peritoneal infection in 2 cases in OSPDP group,all were cured by conservative therapy.Conclusions LSPDP is a safe,effective,less traumatic and more economic surgical approach for benign cystic tumors located at the body or tail of the pancreas.
ABSTRACT
Objective The retrograde isolated hepatic perfusion (RIHP) model was used to compare with the isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) model in reducing the rate of normal hepatic tissue toxicity and peripheral drug leakage during chemotherapy in rat liver. Methods A total of 90 male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 300-350 g were randomized into 3 groups with 30 rats in each. Group A: perfusion with Lactated Ringer'S Solution through arteria hepatica (RA) and portal vein (PV),the inferior vena cava was used as an outflow tract of perfusate. Group B: For isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP), Fluorouracil (5-FU) was added into the perfusate at a dose of 350mg/kg and introduced in to the liver through arteria hepatica, portal vein was perfused by Lactated Ringer'S Solution, and the inferior vena cava was used as an outflow tract of perfusate. Group C: by using retrograde isolated hepatic perfusion (RIHP), the solution which contains 350 mg/kg Fluorouracil (5-FU) was also introduced through arteria hepatica, the inferior vena cava was introduced with Lactated Ringer'S Solution;the portal vein was used as an outflow tract of the perfusate. On day 1, 3, 5 and 7 after the perfusion in all groups, blood serum ALT test and liver histopathology test were performed. The peripheral blood drug levels were measured with high performance liquid chromatographic(HPLC) system in group B and group C. Results The survival rate was 90%, 86.7% and 90% in group A, B and C,respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed in the survival rate among the 3groups. In all the three groups, serum ALT levels were the highest on the first day after IHP: (481.6±207.6)μmol/LingroupA;(1641. 6±658.0) μmol/LingroupBand( 913. 0±353. 5)μmol/Lin group C. Significant higher serum ALT levels were observed by comparing group B and C with A(P＜0. 05). Meanwhile, the serum ALT levels were significantly higher in group B than in group C (P＜0.05). The peaks of peripheral blood drug concentration during the perfusion were 131.2±29.4μg/ml in group B and 65.3±28. 4μg/ml in group C. Significant difference was observed (P＜0. 05). Liver biopsies of group A showed mild changes on the first day after IHP and returned to normal after 7 days. Group B showed severe changes on the first day after IHP and local necrosis still existed after 7 days. Group C showed moderate changes as compared with group B on the first day after IHP and also returned to normal after 7 days. Conclusion Retrograde isolated hepatic perfusion (RIHP) can reduce the liver toxicity compared to isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP). Hopefully, RIHP will be considered as a safer way in regional chemotherapy in liver cancer.